Baseline visit v2 schema (r2)

cvs.com

https://www.cvs.com/

Aug 14, 2026, 7:02 PM UTC

cut short: fingerprinting evidence was censored before completion — the in-page fingerprint observer did not finish (recorded loss count: 1); recorded by the scanner

Public corrections ledger · SBL-CORR-2026-001

This report has a reviewed clarification

SBL-CORR-2026-001: The historical input-probe disclosure overstates coverage. Unload-only transmissions were not reliably recorded. Focus and blur handlers could run, and per-field failures were not fully counted. These reports cannot establish absence of input transmission outside their retained observations.

Read the public review record

Evidence quality

This report is built on an incomplete visit

Incomplete evidence: evidence was cut short before completion (fingerprinting evidence was censored before completion — the in-page fingerprint observer did not finish (recorded loss count: 1); request evidence was censored before completion — the producer recorded an additional collection loss (recorded loss count: 2)). Counts for the affected evidence are lower bounds; families that completed carry only their ordinary limits. The evidence receipt states the exact per-visit quality.

Scan report ready for cvs.com: 282 recorded request rows.

Comparison Reportv2 schema (r2)

cvs.com

https://www.cvs.com/
ShareDownloads the GPC off visit's request CSV, source report and correction context in a ZIP. Follows the evidence switcher below.PDF + evidence (opens in a new tab)Downloads a ZIP containing the PDF for every recorded visit, exact source JSON, correction context and file hashes. The scanner renders it on request.

What this actually means

cvs.com contacted catalogued Google and Microsoft domains during this visit.

SBL-CORR-2026-001: The historical input-probe disclosure overstates coverage. Unload-only transmissions were not reliably recorded. Focus and blur handlers could run, and per-field failures were not fully counted. These reports cannot establish absence of input transmission outside their retained observations.

5tracking-service entities
121cross-site requests
9third-party cookie records

Plain-Language Findings

What this visit means

Unfamiliar terms are defined in the glossary
playwright-chromium

Worth checking

Bottom line: this visit has review-worthy signals

The scan observed signals a non-expert should not have to decode from raw request tables. Some detector evidence was incomplete; each affected detector card states its own retained or unavailable scope, while completed request, cookie, and storage measurements keep their recorded exactness.

The cards below translate the evidence into plain language; severity reflects fixed reference thresholds, not measured population percentiles. The request log, domain table, and methodology remain below for verification.

282 requests observed in one controlled visit.

Worth checking

68 of 268 requests the engine evaluated matched Brave Shields filter lists

68 requests matched the default filter lists of Brave Shields, the ad and tracker blocker built into the Brave browser, while loading normally.

Computed with Brave's own ad-block engine and default filter lists in classification mode: matched requests were not blocked by the scanner and remain in this report's observed request counts. Matching shows what Shields would target on this visit's traffic; an actual Shields visit blocks these and also prevents their follow-on requests, so this number is neither a measured block count nor the total effect.

The hand-curated service catalog separately matched 59 request rows in this visit.Show matched requests

Context

This GPC comparison supports no comparable delta

The pair did not record the network egress region for both visits, and an unrecorded condition never counts as matching. and The variant visit did not completely capture this evidence family, so its values are unavailable or incomplete rather than comparable totals.

The raw request logs of both visits remain below for transparency, but the diff between them supports no claim about what the compared condition changed.

2 disqualifying conditions named by the report's claim policy.

Worth checking

Consent tooling and requests to tracking-service entities appeared before any choice

cvs.com sent a request to OneTrust, a consent management platform (the tooling that shows cookie banners), and the request log included 5 distinct catalogued tracking-related services before the scanner made any consent choice; 5 companies answered.

A request to the platform's loader proves the page attempted to fetch consent tooling; an observed response supports delivery, but neither fact proves a banner was visibly shown to this scanner. Banner display can vary by region and visit context. The scanner never clicks a banner in this mode, so this report records requests made before the scanner made a consent choice. It does not determine whether any request required consent or whether the site's behavior complied with applicable law. More tracking-service entities or requests may appear after "Accept" than this report captures, so the counts here are lower bounds for users who consent.

Consent platform detected via a request to cdn.cookielaw.org.

Context

Tracking companies the privacy policy does not appear to name

Google, Tealium and Microsoft, plus 2 others were sent requests during this visit, but the policy text matched none of the names this scan knows those companies by.

Policies often disclose vendor categories rather than company names, so an unnamed vendor is a transparency gap worth reviewing, not automatically a violation.

Policy at https://www.cvs.com/{seg}/help/{seg}; 0 checkable statements matched; 0 of 5 observed tracking companies named in the policy.

Worth checking

Catalogued service domains recorded responses during this visit

Google, Tealium and Microsoft, plus 2 others appeared in the request log.

A catalog match identifies a maintainer-reviewed service/domain mapping; it does not establish why an individual request occurred, what it carried, or whether profiling happened. Functional catalog labels include advertising, analytics / tag management and tag management / customer data. This scan could not identify 10 of the 29 third-party hosts recorded here, so it cannot say who operates them. That is a limit of identity coverage, not evidence about the site.

121 cross-site requests across 29 third-party hosts.Modest distinct tracking-service entities count.Show third-party requests

Context

Requests were dispatched to catalogued major-platform domains

This visit dispatched requests to catalogued domains for Google and Microsoft.

The domain matches identify services, not the requests' purpose, payload, or whether any profile linking occurred.

48 requests to these platforms.Show catalog-matched requests

Nothing observed

Google Analytics present, no remarketing signal

Google Analytics was observed, but no DoubleClick remarketing sync appeared in this visit.

Standard analytics collection was observed, without the stats.g.doubleclick.net advertising sync.

Google Analytics host observed; no stats.g.doubleclick.net request.Show catalog-matched requests

Worth checking

Third-party cookies were present

9 third-party cookies showed up during the visit.

The scanner observed cookie metadata whose domain crossed the scanned site's registrable-domain boundary. This report does not retain cookie values or partition keys, so it does not establish whether a cookie was a persistent identifier or could recognize a visitor across sites.

136 cookies total in this report.Elevated third-party cookies count (at or above the 5 reference threshold).

Context

Fingerprint-like browser APIs were called

At least 1 retained high-entropy API call appeared in the incomplete instrumentation log.

These calls can be legitimate (charts, graphics, media), so the count is observational, not a severity score, and it excludes Web and Service Workers. Top calls: webgl.getParameter.UNMASKED_RENDERER_WEBGL.

Retained incomplete evidence includes 1 API event record; no exact API-family total is available.

GPC Comparison

GPC off and GPC on: two visits, no comparable metric delta

GPC off: 16,230msGPC on: 16,669ms
No metric deltas are comparable across these two visits, so none are shown.
  • Request, cookie, and storage deltas (each visit's own evidence still renders below): The pair did not record the network egress region for both visits, and an unrecorded condition never counts as matching. The variant visit did not completely capture this evidence family, so its values are unavailable or incomplete rather than comparable totals.
  • Catalog-matched request and entity deltas (each visit's own evidence still renders below): The pair did not record the network egress region for both visits, and an unrecorded condition never counts as matching. The variant visit did not completely capture this evidence family, so its values are unavailable or incomplete rather than comparable totals.
  • Other detector and causal-path deltas (each visit's own evidence still renders below): The pair did not record the network egress region for both visits, and an unrecorded condition never counts as matching. The fingerprint-heuristics detector's status differed between the two visits, so their numbers measure different things. The variant visit did not completely capture this evidence family, so its values are unavailable or incomplete rather than comparable totals. The baseline visit did not completely capture this evidence family, so its values are unavailable or incomplete rather than comparable totals.
  • The Shields-number delta (each visit's own evidence still renders below): The pair did not record the network egress region for both visits, and an unrecorded condition never counts as matching. The variant visit did not completely capture this evidence family, so its values are unavailable or incomplete rather than comparable totals.
  • Fingerprinting deltas (each visit's own evidence still renders below): At least one visit did not complete the fingerprint measurement, so no exact cross-visit delta is shown.
  • Ad-pixel deltas (each visit's own evidence still renders below): At least one visit did not complete the pixel measurement, so no exact cross-visit delta is shown.

Measurement limits

7 conditions affect how this evidence reads

Both visits

  • Each visit in this report is one automated, headless Chromium visit from a fixed en-US / UTC profile, with no scrolling, clicking, or consent interaction. Sites can behave differently for real users, browsers, regions, accounts, or network locations.
  • Counts are a lower bound: trackers that load only after interaction or consent are not observed; Service Workers are blocked, and Web Worker or WebSocket traffic may be incomplete. Service labels use a US-biased hand-curated catalog, so regional services may be under-labeled. Cookie and storage figures are an end-of-visit snapshot, with storage keys read from the top frame only.
  • The page did not reach network idle before the scan window ended.
  • The in-page fingerprint observer could not read one or more frames, so fingerprint-like API calls and heuristics for this visit are incomplete.
  • This scan typed a synthetic test value into 1 form field (never submitting the form) to test whether typed input is captured and sent to third parties. The value is synthetic and is not stored. Requests the page sent during and after this typing, including any unload beacons, are part of the recorded request log and counts.
  • Read the site's privacy policy (https://www.cvs.com/{seg}/help/{seg}) and compared its text against this visit's observed behavior. Policy checks are an automated text match with the matched sentences quoted, not a legal reading.

GPC on visit only

  • The scan blocked or could not verify one or more Web Workers while applying the simulated GPC signal; request evidence may be incomplete.

This versioned report is currently retained in the public corpus. Follow the currently retained site history, repeat the same public route when it is available, or request a transparent evidence correction.

Report ID
20260814-bed33c7608b4349175e9a9129f7b8ce8
Site
cvs.com
Latest visit
Schema
v2 schema (r2)
Verify recorded provenance

Baseline visit

Started
Run quality
cut short: fingerprinting evidence was censored before completion — the in-page fingerprint observer did not finish (recorded loss count: 1); recorded by the scanner
Scanner
playwright-chromium
Browser
151.0.7922.34
Redaction
version 4
Methodology
shields-request-context-v2-adblock-rust-0.13.2-request-method-v1-playwright-1.62.1+subject-validity-v2+detector-coverage-v2+phase-kernel-v2+boundary-state-v1+consent-r2-v4+resource-budget-v1+proxy-traffic-v1+service-worker-block-v1+detector-accountability-v1+service-role-taxonomy-v1
Detector registry
node-detectors-v4100de91713270067dff4f5ecebeea61d330982c7a5aa33395bae3dd604adedd2
Tracker catalog digest
e94970de235fc80254de8ed99b94316a252e52aa1c2e748c8fbfc3c093b908f4
Brave-list instrument
engine adblock-rust-0.13.20f52cc524a8999a1022279aca74003ece9720f267bc678430727b7312d43f0ac
Normalization
redaction-v4+allowlists-v3:269f631f04090ce582644ee3cf0e5c5b6bb425dc4929bc283607b808bc9322a9+public-string-policy-v3:6c78c05523e1f16c88264d0144af33587bd6dc11e04d337a6af2d58190639266+tldts@7.4.10+node-evidence-policy-v1+r2-http-status-compat-v1

Variant visit

Started
Run quality
cut short: request evidence was censored before completion — the producer recorded an additional collection loss (recorded loss count: 2); fingerprinting evidence was censored before completion — the in-page fingerprint observer did not finish (recorded loss count: 1); recorded by the scanner
Scanner
playwright-chromium
Browser
151.0.7922.34
Redaction
version 4
Methodology
shields-request-context-v2-adblock-rust-0.13.2-request-method-v1-playwright-1.62.1+subject-validity-v2+detector-coverage-v2+phase-kernel-v2+boundary-state-v1+consent-r2-v4+resource-budget-v1+proxy-traffic-v1+service-worker-block-v1+detector-accountability-v1+service-role-taxonomy-v1
Detector registry
node-detectors-v4100de91713270067dff4f5ecebeea61d330982c7a5aa33395bae3dd604adedd2
Tracker catalog digest
e94970de235fc80254de8ed99b94316a252e52aa1c2e748c8fbfc3c093b908f4
Brave-list instrument
engine adblock-rust-0.13.20f52cc524a8999a1022279aca74003ece9720f267bc678430727b7312d43f0ac
Normalization
redaction-v4+allowlists-v3:269f631f04090ce582644ee3cf0e5c5b6bb425dc4929bc283607b808bc9322a9+public-string-policy-v3:6c78c05523e1f16c88264d0144af33587bd6dc11e04d337a6af2d58190639266+tldts@7.4.10+node-evidence-policy-v1+r2-http-status-compat-v1

Recorded provenance is self-reported measurement metadata, not a cryptographic attestation. The public versioned report JSON contains the retained public evidence; see the methodology for interpretation and retention limits.

This report covers what the scanner measures, not everything a site can do. 16 browser surfaces are not instrumented at all (Every page except the one that was scanned; Anything that only loads after scrolling or interaction; Why a request happened, as a causal chain; and 13 others), 3 capabilities are declined by policy, and 3 are outside what any single visit can see. Their absence from this report is not evidence that they did not occur. Read the published coverage boundary.

Detector accuracy is unmeasured. No calibration study currently publishes a precision or recall for the detectors on this page, so a detector match here is a recorded observation, not a calibrated classification. How detector accuracy is measured.

Approved use boundary: This report is investigative evidence that requires independent corroboration. It is not a standalone legal determination and not the sole exhibit in a legal proceeding. Recorded in this project's release manifest on .